In the United States, unlike many other states, treaties and other international agreements are not transposed into their national legislation. Rather, the U.S. Constitution provides that ”all treaties that are entered into or are to be entered into under the authority of the United States are the supreme law of the land.”  In other words, they are part of U.S. law without the need to implement them. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the domestic legal effect of an executive agreement is the same as a treaty.  The signing of the CLOUD Act between the United States and the United Kingdom was made possible by the adoption by the British Parliament of the Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Act, which creates a framework of British law similar to that established by the SCA in the United States. The agreement only recognises the last factor – the commitment to a free and open internet – by noting that one of its objectives is to ”protect privacy, civil liberties and an open internet”. Like the analysis of human rights, this provision appears to be based on a basic conception of UK and US law and not on a specific clause in the agreement. The term ”Executive Agreement” is not defined by either U.S. law or the VCLT, but scientists have explained its contours. An executive agreement is ”a treaty concluded and ratified by the executive without the formal authorization of a legislative body in a State where treaties are normally ratified only with such consent.